Yue Wang wrote:
>> The problem is that that's only a dirty trick that is not supposed to
>> work and might stop working in the future, so I would rather try not
>> to rely on it. A better interface for XeTeX typescripts (something
>> similar to fontspec) is missing heavily.
>>
>
> I prefer use opentype features xxxx than add some non-standard
> definition like fontspec.
i have no clue what you mean here
> so I dont think fontspec do a good job.
> You can always use
> \definefontfeature
> [myfontfeatures]
> [script=latn,language=dflt,liga=yes,kern=yes,tlig=yes,onum=yes,
> xxxx=yes, xxxx=yes]
\definefontfeature
[oldstyle]
[script=latn,language=dflt,liga=yes,kern=yes,tlig=yes,onum=yes]
\definefontfeature
[myoldstyle]
[oldstyle]
[xxxx=yes,xxxx=yes]
> \definefontsynonym[a font name][a physical font][features=myoldstyle]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
