Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I uploaded a new beta. There are changes in the cached font data but
>> this should not affect runs (apart from some fonts being recached). The
>> memory footprint of fonts is slightly smaller, in otf we now handle
>> multiple unicode -> one glyph situations.
>>
>> As part of redoing structure related code i rewrote the moveable block
>> code which will be part of the major update later this year. It's not
>> yet 100% functional compatible but faster and more flexible. I'm
>> wondering, are there mkiv users out there who use the block features?
>
> I tested the new block code with MkIV and everything is fine
> except two unnecessary files in my working directory, they are
> \jobname-texutil0.tmp and texutil.tub.
no surprise because the new code is not yet in the beta -)
the tub file is there for a second pass (backward refs) and the tmp is
just the last block
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
