Dohyun Kim wrote:
> 2009/3/2 Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl>:
>> Yanrui Li wrote:
>>> There are some Chinese punctuations,
>>> such as “，" (fullwidth comma), "！" (fullwidth exclamation mark) and so on,
>>> which are considered to be "chinese" but not "full_width_close" by
>>> scrp-cjk.lua.
>>> Is this deliberately doing?
>> we have different vectors for chinese and korean and each of them can be
>> optimized, of there can be several for each script
>>
>> keep in mind that when korean uses chinese, it does not use the chinese
>> rules
>>
>
> Those Chinese punctuations we Koreans seldom use.
> Nor we normally use characters from U+FF00 .. U+FFFF area.
> So it's OK to delete this line in scip-ini.lua :
>
> for i=0x0FF00,0x0FFEF do hash[i] = "chinese" end
>
> as requested by Chinese people.
>
> Or it would be better if the order is reversed, that is to say,
> if the line mentioned above and other adjacent lines comes before
> the hash table of individual characters.
then we'd need to do each assignment individually; so instead i now have
for i=0x0FF00,0x0FFEF do if not hash[i] then hash[i] = "chinese"
end end
i.e. a test before an assigment so that the first table takes precedence.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
