Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:48:11 +0200 Eythan Weg wrote: > Taco Hoekwater <t...@elvenkind.com> > Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:53:17 +0200 > > Eythan Weg wrote: > > > In an earlier message I have provided logs, > > which may contain hints, (but I could not find any). > Neither can I. The situation is weird because you seem to be > the > only person (so far?) suffering from this problem. > > > Ok. I had this definition in cont-sys.tex > > \definefontfeature > [default] [default] > [protrusion=pure, expansion=quality, mode=node, script=latn, > liga=yes] > > 0.38 works with it and 0.39 does not. > > Why the diff? what font do you test?
No font in particular. I thought that any subsequent request for a body font with this default feature would be fulfilled this way. btw, such a patch is rather inefficient as it will expand nearly all fonts which might not be what you want and indeed it crashes Thank you. Eythan ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
