> While it would be nice to have an updated "ConTeXt the Manual", in my humble > opinion the biggest hole > in the documentation is a reference for each command. Texshow-web should fill > this gap and this is > where the community CAN contribute, and where the mechanism already exists. > And because it's made up of > small articles it could work. When I learn about a command I try to fill in a > few words in > texshow-web. If everyone added a few words each time they learn a new > command, we would soon have > a fantastic reference source. > > Richard > > P.S. One request for improvement to texshow-web: the source-file for each > command is included > in cont-en.xml, could this be displayed on the command web-page? It would > make it easier to > find the source if you need to.
I have promised to Taco that I will transfer the contents of texshow-web to the wiki this month. Then we can do everything the wiki can do now. Patrick ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
