Dear Otared,
Am Freitag, den 04.02.2011, 20:45 +0100 schrieb Otared Kavian:
> I think one should use \overline instead of \overbar in your example. For me
> the following works fine with mkiv:
> \starttext
> \startformula
> \overline{q} = \frac{\overline{q}}{\overline{α_0}}
> \stopformula
> In text $\overline{q} = \frac{\overline{q}}{\overline{α_0}}$.
> \startformula
> \overline{q_0} = \frac{\overline{q}}{\overline α}
> \stopformula
> \stoptext
> (one gets as expected the « conjugate » of α_0, for instance).
thank you for your answer. `\overline` works as you say, but it looks
typographically different in the respect that the bar is closer to the
letter, which of course solves the issue for the inline fraction. For α
this looks quite strange in my eyes. But I do not know a lot about
typography.
Please find the PDF-output attached with the following ConTeXt version.
MTXrun | current version: 2011.02.04 10:01
Thanks,
Paul
test.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
