Am 06.03.2011 um 00:03 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2011, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
>> On 4-3-2011 7:05, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>>
>>> In which are these alternatives are better than my module__command, you
>>> replace only the _ by !
>>
>> because an ! stands out; anyway, we should avoid multiple _ in a row
>>
>> (i'll put a few mkvi modules in the core to get a feeling .. using _ does
>> not always look better btw)
>
> Here is an experiment with @ and _. I would prefer to change @ to :: (but for
> that we would need to change the ptrcatcodes).
+1 for “:”
I can then change this
\unexpanded\def\annotation_placement_define
{\dodoubleargument\annotation_placement__define}
\def\annotation_placement__define[#name][#command]%
{\setvalue{annotation:#name}{#command}}
to (took the “o” from latex3 :)
\unexpanded\def\annotation_placement_define
{\dodoubleargument\annotation_placement_define:oo}
\def\annotation_placement_define:oo[#name][#command]%
{\setvalue{annotation:#name}{#command}}
Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
