On Di, 2011-05-24 at 15:25 +0200, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > Am 24.05.2011 um 13:14 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> > to markup the probability measure and the parenthesis around the
> > argument, I defined the following command.
> >
> > \define[1]\P{{\mathbf P}\left( #1 \right)}
> >
> > Unfortunately the space between the P and the left ( is a little big in
> > my opinion. Is that correct or should/can I fix that somehow?
>
> You can insert negative kerning with “\!”.
>
> \define[1]\P{{\mathbf P}\!\left(#1\right)}
Thank you for the quick reply.
> BTW: You redefine the already existing \P (expands to ¶) command.
I should read the log to notice such problems. I guess I will use `\Pr`
then.
But seriously does somebody really need a lot of ¶ in there texts? (If
yes I would be interested when.) If not, why is such a nice command name
reserved for such a purpose?
I guess this has been there for a long time, so redefining would break
too much?
Thanks,
Paul
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
