On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 19:57, Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote: > On 27-9-2011 19:52, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> >> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 19:44, Hans Hagen wrote: >>> >>> there is some fall back mechanism that does that but as soon as one >>> defined >>> his/her own typescript that can interfere >> >> How should we define trypescripts to avoid interference then? > > A typeface definition normally has a matching monospace and math definition > (so: ss + tt + mm or rm + tt + mm or in some cases rm + ss + tt + mm). Of > course some relative scaling has to be considered then.
Do you want to say that we need an explicit definition of LM Math? Just curious: how much information is missing/how much would would it be if we would want to create a virtual math font by combining LM + populating italic/bold/bold italic latin and greek math alphabets from text font? Would that look horrible because of lack of information about glyph metrics? Mojca ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
