Am 19.03.2012 um 22:27 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:

> Hi,
> 
> are subfootnotes not yet rewritten, or did the syntax change?
> 
> The following example expects 2.a but gives 2.1:
> 
> \definestructureseparatorset [footnote][][]
> \definestructureconversionset[footnote][numbers,characters][numbers]
> \setupenumerations[footnote][numberconversionset=footnote,numberseparatorset=footnote]

Use \setupnotation[footnote][…].

Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to