On 06/20/2012 04:40 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
I uploaded a version that has the bTABLE mechanism reorganized (different low level names etc). Hopefully nothing got broken in the process.
Unfortunately it is broken. Minimal example:


\starttext

\bTABLE
  \bTR\bTD[nc=2] r1c1 \eTD\eTR
  \bTR\bTD r2c1 \eTD\bTD r2c2 \eTD\eTR
\eTABLE

\stoptext

Error message:

! Missing number, treated as zero.

system > tex > error on line 6 in file test.tex: Missing number, treated as zero ...

1     \starttext
2
3     \bTABLE
4       \bTR\bTD[nc=2] r1c1 \eTD\eTR
5       \bTR\bTD r2c1 \eTD\bTD r2c2 \eTD\eTR
6 >>  \eTABLE
7
8     \stoptext
9

<to be read again>
                   \relax
\2>>1 ...l_ntb_get_dis \scratchcounter \fi \relax
\advance \scratchcounter \...
\redorecurse ->\expandrecursecontent
                                     \dodorecurse
<to be read again>
                   {
<inserted text>
                2
\dodorecurse ... \expandafter {\the \innerrecurse
                                                  }{#2}
...
l.6 \eTABLE

?
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to