On 04/16/2013 11:05 AM, Marco Patzer wrote:
It doesn't make sense to use named parameters with
\define, since you explicitly pass the parameter*number* in
brackets. You cannot refer to a number by name. Well, you could
theoretically, but I'd strongly object.
Just out of curiosity: why would you object? In Lua, we have the syntax
function whatever(one, two, three)
do something with(one, two, three)
end
I'm not lobbying for define to have something similar, I just want to
point out that it would be in the spirit of convergence between ConTeXt
and Lua. It certainly isn't an urgent need, but having
\define[one,two,three]
wouldn't be absurd, now would it?
Thomas
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
