Am 03.05.2013 um 12:39 schrieb "H. Özoguz" <h.oezo...@mmnetz.de>:
> Thanks.
>
>> You can use \framed but like a minipage no page breaks are possible in a
>> block.
>>
>> > This sets very well the german and the arabic text, with different
>> > interlinespaces. Is there a possibility to copy this into ConText?
>>
>> You can use natural tables (or xtables) and use the loffset and roffset keys
>> for
>> margins between both columns. You can also hide the table commands in your
>> own macros for the texts.
>
> Maybe the minipages/frames are really the only possibility, so that I have to
> resign page-breaking, sad, but if this is the only way... Because without
> different line-interspaces the arabic text is definitely not well readable.
>
Why don’t you use natural tables where each cell *is a frame*.
> Now I tried it with frames; this is my try (from the wiki):
>
> \starttext
> \startcombination[2*1]
> {\framed
> [width=4cm,
> align={flushleft}]
> {\input ward }}
> {\framed
> [width=4cm,
> align={flushleft,nothyphenated,verytolerant}] % maybe also stretch
> {\tfb \input ward }}
> \stopcombination
> \stoptext
>
> But it seems to not matter, if I write 2*1 or 1*2, in both cases the frames
> are set one below the other, and not side by side (what I want). Why?
Each entry in combination consists a the content and the caption but in your
example the first frame is the content and the second the caption.
When you want two things side by side you can use \placesidebyside{…}{…}.
Wolfgang___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
