On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:24:50 +0200
Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote:
> you use the wrong command and there is also the scope parameter
>
> \setupnotes[footnote][split=verystrict,scope=page]
Can you clarify this? The syntax is confusing, probably because it has
evolved.
Currently, I use:
\setupnotation [footnote] [way=bypage,numberconversion=set 2]
for example, but maybe this is no longer the recommended syntax?
Also, in order to restore gobbled space following,%
\startfootnote
\stopfootnote
I use the following setup:
\setupnote [footnote] [next={ }]
So \setupnotation, \setupnote, \setupnotes is confusing.
Of course, there is
strc-not.mkvi:\let\setupnotes\setupnote
so \setupnotes is just a synonym for \setupnote.
And then there is also:
strc-not.mkvi:\let\setupnotations\setupnotation
>From what I understand, footnotes can be handled using different
mechanisms, and this is why it gets confusing for users.
Alan
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
