+π from me. My preference would be BitBucket (slightly simpler than github and allows for free private repositories), but, either way, the result is the same: fewer steps to updating the manual. Moving away from svn to git is also a step in the right direction, IMO.
One aspect of wikis that I thoroughly enjoy is the ability to fix something (contribute) immediately. Moving to a web-based repository for the manual removes barriers (such as waiting upon moderated approvals whilst the moderator vacations) to letting people contribute to projects. Throw in a nightly build (with blaming) to ensure that the manual compile is never broken (for long). Regards.
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
