On 11/18/2013 11:45 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
2. Define a new mathclass "intop" and use that in char-def.lua. Then, in
the appropriate math-*.lua file, map intop to the appropriate macro.
What would be the best way to go?
i prefer 2 (as these set the defaults) and we can make a definer for
specific variants if needed (at all)
Great.
is intop the best name? (we don't need to be sparse)
How about: integral or integral_operator?
we have radical, limop, nolimop so maybe intop and nointop are ok (we
can have verbose synonyms but then we also need them for lim)
just wrap up what is needed and i'll look into it (or you can provide
patches)
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
