On 2013-11-27 Hans Hagen wrote: > On 11/27/2013 10:20 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote: > > On 2013-11-27 Hans Hagen wrote: > >> On 11/27/2013 9:53 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote: > >>> On 2013-11-27 Hans Hagen wrote: > >>>> On 11/27/2013 8:44 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> during my attempts to patch the Palatino's dotless 'i' I found > >>>>> that this font is parsed incorrectly by ConTeXt. > >>>>> > >>>>> Comparing index/name info of individual glyphs in the font > >>>>> software and resulting pala.tma file there is the following > >>>>> difference: > >>>>> > >>>>> Index | Name - font | Name - tma > >>>>> 1110 | dotlessi.smcp | i.sc (1) > >>>>> 1170 | i.smcp | i.sc (2) > >>>>> > >>>>> The first one should have IMHO a different name, e.g. dotlessi.sc > >>>>> (to keep conventions). The same name for two glyphs > >>>>> might be dangerous. > >>>> > > the fact that there are two i.sc in the font is suspicious ... best > check the font in fontforge ... one never know what kind of things > other programs do
Hmm, FontForge glyphs naming corresponds to what we can observe in the ConTeXt (doubled i.sc). My previous analysis was based on FontLab. I am confused now... Jan ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
