Am 2014-04-18 um 01:42 schrieb Joshua Krämer <joshua.krae...@gmail.com>:

> On 2014-04-16, 9:45, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> 
>> I don’t think Baltica is very legible, even if it fits the style.
> 
> It is based on Candida, which I find quite legible especially in small
> texts for German.  It is for example used by the German Magazine
> "Focus", you can see an example here (from "Focus Schule"):
> http://news.elli-e.de/Focus2000.jpg

Thank you!
I tried a slab serif as body font only once (can’t remember which), for a book 
that I typeset during vocational school, and I wouldn’t try it again.

> However, I don't know how legible its cyrillic characters are.

Cyrillic is illegible per se ;-)
Seriously, I find Cyrillic text always looks like in all small caps, besides me 
still not used to reading it.

> Anyway, I have no objections against a sans serif like Journal!

Thank you ;-)

For now I decided to use just PT Serif plus PT Sans. Everything that I tried 
yet in „historic“ looks didn’t please my eyes.


Greetlings, Hraban
---
http://www.fiee.net/texnique/
http://wiki.contextgarden.net
https://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer)


___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to