On 2014-05-15 Hans Hagen wrote: > On 5/14/2014 10:21 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > I've finished a rough comparision of various engines for their > > typographical quality: http://drifted.in/publishing/ > > > > From my point of view the ConTeXt is the best offering in this > > field to date, so congratulation! > > > > If you find something inappropriate or misleading in my text, please > > comment or let me know. > > > > If my ConTeXt examples could be written more efficiently, I am open > > to fix it. > > Font expansion only, applied to a limited character subset > > Is that true? It is applied to any character that you want, of course > given that you associate expansion factors, but that happens for quite > some characters in context.
Good point, it should be clarified it is a default vector set, which can be further customized (extended). My info is based on this Wiki http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Protrusion pointing to this source code: http://source.contextgarden.net/font-ext.lua By that subset I mean the table vectors['default'] > Concerning homogenization, context has support for dynamically aplying > feature (alternates) to improve the look and feel but of course not > many fonts have multiple variants for glyphs grouped in stylistic > alternates so this mechanism is hardly used (only for some arabic). Yes, I am aware of this, but it is indeed not very obvious from the text. Thanks for your suggestions, Jan ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________