On 8/3/2015 9:25 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Hans, Idris, Talal,
Some years ago we had a discussion on the issue, but I don’t remember where we
ended up…
In my opinion, I think that the numberings should be maned as follows:
arabicnumerals: should be ١,٢,٣,٤,٥,٦,٧,٨,٩,٠
persiannumerals: should be ۱ ۲ ۳ ۴ ۵ ۶ ۷ ۸ ۹ ۰
abjadnumerals: should be الف، ب، ج، د، ه، و، ز،…..
As of today it seems that « persiannumerals » results in what should be named
abjadnuemrals, and this is not correct.
so you and idris and tatal has to come to some agreement on that
we have these alphabetic ones
arabicnumerals
persiannumerals
arabicexnumerals
and some special ones
abjadnumerals
abjadnodotnumerals
(these use small, medium, large chars and do special things with 10 100
1000)
and now
arabicdecimals
persiandecimals
see core-con.lua
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
