On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:10:27 +0100 "Thomas A. Schmitz" <thomas.schm...@uni-bonn.de> wrote:
> But don't let anyone > tell you that explicit names are "antiquated." They make TeX or xml > source documents so much more readable! And when you have to retrace > five levels of \startsectionlevels because you want to change the > structure of your document, you will rue the day you abandoned proper > names. When you want to change the structure of your document when using structure levels, all that you need do is add or subtract a level of nesting. With named levels, it is easy to create complicated documents that jump around in level, which would be pretty messy. What a nightmare it would be to add or subtract a named structure level in a complicated document. This being said, I still mostly use named structure levels myself, as old habits are hard to change (but don't tell Hans this!). Alan ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
