Does anyone have a tip for me? I really want these tags in my document. Many thanks in advance,
On 27 February 2017 at 19:22, Antoine Cailliau <antoinecaill...@gmail.com> wrote: > I try to replicate the following : https://mailman.ntg.nl/ > pipermail/ntg-context/2006/021038.html (i.e. the equivalent of \tag in > latex/amsmath). More precisely this: > >> %------------------------8<-------------------------- >> \def\placeformulatag% >> {\dosingleempty\doplaceformulatag} >> \def\doplaceformulatag[#1]#2% >> {\let\normalstopformula\stopformula >> \def\stopformula% >> {\normalstopformula >> \restorenumber[formula] >> \egroup >> \let\stopformula\normalstopformula} >> \bgroup >> \savenumber[formula] >> \def\dummyconversion##1{#2} >> \defineconversion[dummyconversion][\dummyconversion] >> \setupformulas[conversion=dummyconversion] >> \placeformula[#1]} >> >> \starttext >> \placeformulatag[tag]{test} \startformula >> E = mc^2 >> \stopformula >> See \in formula[tag] for a tagged formula >> \stoptext >> %----------------------------8<------------------------- > > > However, the following (simpler) code produce an "Undefined control > sequence" when using \in command. > > \starttext >> { >> \def\a#1{test} >> \defineconversion[a][\a] >> \setupformulae[numberconversion=a] >> \placeformula[test] >> \startformula E = mc^2 \stopformula >> } >> This is my reference: \in{formula}[test]. >> \stoptext > > > The following code, does not produce the error, but is not practical for > the reproducing the \tag command. > >> >> \starttext >> { >> \def\a#1{test} >> \defineconversion[a][\a] >> \setupformulae[numberconversion=a] >> \placeformula[test] >> \startformula E = mc^2 \stopformula >> This is my reference: \in{formula}[test]. >> } >> \stoptext > > > What am I doing wrong? I guess the command \a is no longer defined when > the compiler hit \in but how can I ensure that such local definition stay > accessible ? > > Thank you in advance, > > Antoine C. > > > On 27 February 2017 at 17:28, Antoine Cailliau <antoinecaill...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks. >> >> I updated the wiki. >> >> On 27 February 2017 at 17:18, Pablo Rodriguez <oi...@gmx.es> wrote: >> >>> On 02/27/2017 04:55 PM, Antoine Cailliau wrote: >>> > The following code is documented to change the numbering of the >>> equations. >>> > However, this still use numerals for the equations. >>> > [...] >>> > Is this a bug ? Is it the correct way to change the numbering ? >>> >>> Hi Antoine, >>> >>> it’s numberconversion (as it reads in “ConTeXt Commands”): >>> >>> \setupformulas[numberconversion=greek] >>> \setupbodyfont[dejavu] >>> \starttext >>> \placeformula[test] >>> \startformula E = mc^2 \stopformula >>> \stoptext >>> >>> BTW, if this is wrong documented in the wiki, please correct it for >>> future reference. >>> >>> Pablo >>> -- >>> http://www.ousia.tk >>> ____________________________________________________________ >>> _______________________ >>> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry >>> to the Wiki! >>> >>> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/list >>> info/ntg-context >>> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net >>> archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ >>> wiki : http://contextgarden.net >>> ____________________________________________________________ >>> _______________________ >> >> >> >
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
