On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 4:46 PM, Christoph Reller < christoph.rel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 15 May 2018 08:23:04 +0200 luigi scarso <luigi.sca...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 8:15 AM, Christoph Reller < >> christoph.rel...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> > Our company is producing (and weekly updating) 67 manuals and >> > technical documents from more than 900 ConTeXt source files for our >> > software products. The output PDFs are converted to PDF/A-2a, which is >> > only possible due to ConTeXt's tagging. >> > >> What do you think of verapdf ? >> > > Well, verapdf is only a validator and not a converter. > > And, by the way, there is no reasonable way to convert from, say, PDF/A-2b > to PDF/A-2a without a rediculous amount of AI or manual input because the > tagging cannot be created out of the blue. It has to be there from the > document's birth. This is what makes this ConTeXt feature so precious. > > sure, the point is if verapdf is reliable as validator. -- luigi
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
