On 12/11/2020 6:13 PM, Andres Conrado Montoya wrote:
Firefox doesn't show the "yes", nor Acrobat X, but SumatraPDF does. I modified your definition as:

\definefield[test][check][cbox][][]

And now the "yes" doesn't appear. However, I don't know how this affects the functionality of the form.
these symbols (esp how deafults are handles) has alwaye been a bit of a mess in acrobat (read: different per version) and relates to appearance streams and such (when a form is made in acrobat these streams get added, it could even be some dingbat kicking in or being vectorized or ... seen all kind of variants) ... officially a rendering should listen to some keys that relate to it but this is not always the case

(part of the problem is, i think, that esp for check fields a bugs or behaviour has become a feature which makes it kin dof inconsisten twith the rest of the widgets .. it's even worse when one uses parent / child across pages ... it hasn;t helped that hardly any viewer supported it which in turn means no feedback)

(in lmtx iu could probably generate appearance streams but i'll only do that when i have an application for these widgets so that i can test it)

Hans

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
       tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to