Luca, Burton, or other core / really smart people; any ideas if or why one thread library will work better for ntop than another? If so, if you could generally describe the scheduling / threading environment that ntop likes best, us *BSD guys can maybe make things work better in our world. FreeBSD (others?) support "Linux Threads" with a little effort, but if nTop behaves significantly better in that threading model, then I'll make it so - or maybe just run it on a linux box! It appears I will be "forced" to run this on Solaris 10 sooner than later, so hopefully I won't have TOO much problems with the build and operation on that platform!
TIA! Gary <font size="1"> <div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in'> </div> "This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system." </font>
_______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list Ntop@unipi.it http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
