Hey Michael,

I wouldn't mind testing it out for you. We have a fairly simple CA
environment (offline root, online intermediate) in a Windows 2008 R2 AD
environment.

- Sean

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Michael B. Smith <mich...@smithcons.com>
wrote:

> Forgive the crosspost.
>
>
>
> Webster and myself have some mutual customers that had Certificate
> Services issues. That being one of my areas of expertise, I worked through
> the problems and got everyone happy, but then realized the job would’ve
> been much much simpler with a script that dumped out everything that Active
> Directory knows about AD Certificate Services.
>
>
>
> So, viola, I wrote one; and I’ve enhanced it while working through some
> complex customer scenarios.
>
>
>
> Webster has offered to do the nice things he does to scripts (Word output,
> HTML output, code-signing, etc.) but I’d like to make sure that the script
> is complete before I hand it over to him.
>
>
>
> So I’m looking for a few good testers. I’d like for you to run the script
> and send me the output. If it bombs, let me fix it and try again. IT
> DOESN’T CHANGE ANYTHING. It just reads from AD and the registry.
>
>
>
> If you have a single server CA, you probably aren’t my target scenario –
> unless it’s been migrated and upgraded more than once. Or it was installed
> by someone who had no clue what they were doing and may have installed the
> CA a dozen times (it happens – that was a PIECE of the problem at one of my
> clients). I’m looking for environments with multiple roots, multiple
> servers in a hierarchy, potentially offline roots with an enterprise
> hierarchy, etc.
>
>
>
> If you are interested, please reply to me directly - OFF LIST. Again OFF
> LIST.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael B.
>
>
>
> P.S. There are some things the script could do that it doesn’t do – most
> specifically, validate certs and cross-check CA certs between AIA, CA, CDP,
> and KRA endpoints. It’s doable and a good idea (I needed that in a project
> a year or two ago), but out of scope for this Version 1. But almost
> anything else I can think of is fair game.
>
>
>

Reply via email to