This is really what those involved must be aware of and accountable for. It's their job.
"There are seldom technological blah blah blah ... - Ed Crowley" On Dec 14, 2017 9:28 AM, "Michael B. Smith" <mich...@smithcons.com> wrote: > Do this with Compliance Rules/Policies that prohibit the IP. > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Sean Chapman > *Sent:* Thursday, December 14, 2017 8:34 AM > *To:* ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* RE: [NTSysADM] Remove original message in reply > > > > There have been cases where very long email chains containing intellectual > property information has been discussed and these go on for months at a > time in some cases back and forth. New people are added to conversations > and some people are removed and the owners believe that it’s a good idea to > limit previous information. > > I fully agree that this does not seem like a good idea but its already > been implemented via GPO for our desktops with outlook and they are not > backing down so unfortunately I have to do what the owners demand since > they sign the checks. > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com <listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>] *On Behalf Of *Micheal > Espinola Jr > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 13, 2017 5:35 PM > *To:* ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* Re: [NTSysADM] Remove original message in reply > > > > Technically, yea you could do it. But you'd have to be very careful and > clever. You'd be modifying multiple Content-Type containers (text/plain, > text/html, etc). > > > > More importantly (to me), is what is the business need for this? > > > -- > Espi > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Sean Chapman <schap...@coilcraft.com> > wrote: > > Hey all, > > I got tasked with finding out how to not include the original message in > reply for email (using Office 365) I know this is possible in Outlook but > its not available for outlook online or mobile. Does anyone know of a way > to get this done? I was thinking maybe some crazy exchange transport rule > or possibly some hardware like barracuda or mimecast etc? > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > The information contained in this communication and all accompanying > documents from Coilcraft may be confidential and/or legally privileged, and > is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are > not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any review, > disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance > on the contents of this transmitted information is strictly prohibited. If > you have received this communication in error, please return it to the > sender immediately and destroy the original message or accompanying > materials and any copy thereof. If you have any questions concerning this > message, please contact the sender. > > >