Grrrr....

I'm going to keep pushing - merely having the patch apply via DISM,
and then not agreeing with WSUS that it's applied, is not acceptable.

We'll see how far I get.

Kurt

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 5:25 AM, Michael B. Smith <mich...@smithcons.com> wrote:
> I'm sorry to say that Microsoft support no longer does root cause analysis, 
> unless you pay for premier support. In fact, their opening email should say 
> that, where they define the success criteria for the case. It's very 
> important that you get that wording to your liking.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
> On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 10:17 PM
> To: ntsysadm
> Subject: [NTSysADM] Update on KB4053579
>
> I am not satisfied with MSFTs response on this.
>
> Here's how it played out.
>
> I was able to abscond with an affected laptop, and the tech worked on it for 
> a while.
>
> He was eventually able to see that our AV (ESET) was holding onto the drive.
>
> I uninstalled ESET, rebooted, and he:
>    - Expanded the downloaded patch
>    - Used to DISM apply the patch, which seems to be successful.
>
> However, WSUS is still offering the update, and still requiring updates. The 
> update doesn't show in the list of updates through the Windows Update GUI.
>
> The update does show in the registry, and if I do either a "wmi qfe list" or 
> a powershell wmi query, but the InstalledBy and InstalledOn columns are 
> missing.
>
> MSFT would only work with me on one machine, which I can almost understand - 
> he stated that each machine could have a different cause for failure to 
> install. While that's technically true, I have to believe that this many (35 
> out of just over 100) having this problem will likely have the same root 
> cause. Further, I could point to another machine right now that doesn't have 
> same configuration as the others (no AV), but I'm willing to bet the same 
> root cause.
>
> I'm pushing back, saying that until the client and WSUS agree that this 
> update is installed and no longer needed, the problem isn't really solved.
>
> Kurt
>
>


Reply via email to