The first rule of Symantec is you don't talk about symantec

On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Robert Cato <cato.rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> It is SEP12, I'm sorry I do not know the definition file, that is handled
> by the security group...and they don't really want to talk about Symantec
> right now.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Erik Goldoff <egold...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> curious, SEP 11 or 12, and what definitions when this happened ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Robert Cato <cato.rob...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Yep, all on its own. Granted this was based on setting that were made
>>> during installation, based on recommendations from the onstie Symantec
>>> vendor/engineer.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Kennedy, Jim <
>>> kennedy...@elyriaschools.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  “SEP quarantined the files and then went to all machines on the
>>>> network and quarantined them on all machines…”****
>>>>
>>>> ** **
>>>>
>>>> Holy smokes, it decided to do that on it’s own? And quarantined the
>>>> machines that had NOT been updated yet?****
>>>>
>>>> ** **
>>>>
>>>> So glad I don’t run AV.****
>>>>
>>>> ** **
>>>>
>>>> ** **
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Robert Cato [mailto:cato.rob...@gmail.com]
>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, November 08, 2012 8:45 AM
>>>>
>>>> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>>>> *Subject:* Re: Symantec %@(*&OI:TNGF(P*****
>>>>
>>>>  ** **
>>>>
>>>> Ken****
>>>>
>>>>  ****
>>>>
>>>> These two updates were only installed on a couple of Win7 machines at
>>>> most. They were approved during the day for install overnight, a couple of
>>>> users saw the pop-up and installed. SEP quarantined the files and then went
>>>> to all machines on the network and quarantined them on all machines (Win7,
>>>> Vista, and XP).****
>>>>
>>>>  ****
>>>>
>>>> It would be nice if we had a separate network, but I'm not sure that
>>>> will get approved.****
>>>>
>>>>  ****
>>>>
>>>> Robert****
>>>>
>>>> ** **
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Ken Schaefer <k...@adopenstatic.com>
>>>> wrote:****
>>>>
>>>> Even if you don’t have a separate network, you can create a separate
>>>> group in WSUS, and put a test machine(s) with your SOE image in that group.
>>>> ****
>>>>
>>>>  ****
>>>>
>>>> That would allow you to test patches prior to mass deployment. Checking
>>>> for AV issues would be just one thing – I’d recommend that you have some
>>>> test cases for all your important apps as well.****
>>>>
>>>>  ****
>>>>
>>>> Cheers****
>>>>
>>>> Ken****
>>>>
>>>>  ****
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Robert Cato [mailto:cato.rob...@gmail.com]
>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, 8 November 2012 9:48 PM
>>>>
>>>> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>>>> *Subject:* Re: Symantec %@(*&OI:TNGF(P*
>>>> ****
>>>>
>>>>  ****
>>>>
>>>> Ken,****
>>>>
>>>>  ****
>>>>
>>>> That was my first question, but it is still unanswered. I am still new
>>>> at this %dayjob%. ****
>>>>
>>>>  ****
>>>>
>>>> In this case, the testing would have had to be done in a separate
>>>> network, which I am fairly sure we don't have. I will take that suggestion
>>>> to the table when we analyze the breakdowns of this incident.****
>>>>
>>>>  ****
>>>>
>>>> Robert****
>>>>
>>>>  ****
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Ken Schaefer <k...@adopenstatic.com>
>>>> wrote:****
>>>>
>>>> No matter who you migrate to, you’ll also run into issues (false
>>>> positives seem to occur all the time, with all vendors).****
>>>>
>>>>  ****
>>>>
>>>> Did you test the patches before releasing to Production? Might be worth
>>>> beefing up the testing regime.****
>>>>
>>>>  ****
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Robert Cato [mailto:cato.rob...@gmail.com]
>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, 8 November 2012 5:22 AM
>>>>
>>>> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>>>> *Subject:* Symantec %@(*&OI:TNGF(P*****
>>>>
>>>>  ****
>>>>
>>>>  ****
>>>>
>>>> FYI****
>>>>
>>>>  ****
>>>>
>>>> We approved two MS patches yesterday (KB2574819 KB2592687) in WSUS. One
>>>> user installed the two updates in the afternoon and Symantec Endpoint
>>>> Protection 12 with several advanced features enabled (threat protection,
>>>> hurestics, SONAR, etc). SEP quarrantined 15 system files, run32.dll among
>>>> them. The real problems started when SEP decided to quarantine the files
>>>> across all ~600 workstations taking us completely offline.****
>>>>
>>>>  ****
>>>>
>>>> The fix was to boot each workstation into safe mode and removing SEP.**
>>>> **
>>>>
>>>>  ****
>>>>
>>>> It was a long night.****
>>>>
>>>>  ****
>>>>
>>>> The good news:****
>>>>
>>>> None of the advanced features were enabled on the servers.****
>>>>
>>>> We are migrating away from SEP as of this morning.****
>>>>
>>>>  ****
>>>>
>>>> Robert****
>>>>
>>>>  ****
>>>>
>>>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>>>> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> To manage subscriptions click here:
>>>> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
>>>> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
>>>> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin****
>>>>
>>>>  ****
>>>>
>>>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>>>> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> To manage subscriptions click here:
>>>> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
>>>> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
>>>> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin****
>>>>
>>>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>>>> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> To manage subscriptions click here:
>>>> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
>>>> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
>>>> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin****
>>>>
>>>> ** **
>>>>
>>>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>>>> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> To manage subscriptions click here:
>>>> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
>>>> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
>>>> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin****
>>>>
>>>>  ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>>>> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> To manage subscriptions click here:
>>>> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
>>>> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
>>>> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>>>>
>>>
>>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>>> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>>>
>>> ---
>>> To manage subscriptions click here:
>>> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
>>> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
>>> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>>>
>>
>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>>
>> ---
>> To manage subscriptions click here:
>> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
>> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
>> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to