That's it! "SSD" was the acronym. I kept thinking of superconducting super collider...
________________________________ From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 10:20 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NAS/SAN Solid State drive ? From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 9:04 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NAS/SAN The Dell Equallogic offerings should serve your needs very well. They have products with "redundant everything", and you can get SATA, SAS, and (I forgot the buzz-word for it...) flash-based storage. ________________________________ From: John Aldrich [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 9:06 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: NAS/SAN So, we're working on getting our first big "storage appliance" here. As the IT Manager it's my job to get quotes, etc. I'm talking to all the "big boys" out there and getting a lot of good quotes. My requirements are fairly simple: 1) On the order of 5 Terabytes of storage (significantly more than we are using currently.) 2) Redundant everything (disks, controllers, network, power, etc.) That's about it. We are looking, eventually, to bring email in-house, probably using Kerio mail server as it's got the features we need at a price we can live with. The problem is that I'm getting quotes all over the place. The last quote I got was for a QNap ISCSI NAS with 6 1 Tb drives, but it doesn't have the redundancy I'm looking for (no redundant controllers.) I've gotten quotes from vendors for HP, LSI, NetApp, QNap and am working on an Equallogic quote. Anyone else I should be looking at? Our plan is to get two of these for DR/Business Continuity purposes and have one of them at a remote office, and possibly even back the remote one up to tape. :-) Am I being too paranoid? Not enough? Anything else I should be looking at? At first I was really wanting single-instance storage, but the LSI vendor kind of talked me out of that being a requirement. I get a report every night from the current storage detailing all duplicate files, and there aren't that many so I think I can get away with not having de-duplication/single-instance storage. Your thoughts, please? This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy. This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above, may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please return to sender and delete the message from your computer system.{token} ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
<<image001.jpg>>
<<image002.jpg>>
