We put together our SAN as 6TB of SAS, and 14TB of SATA. 

We further allocated about 3TB of the SAS for SQL DB storage, and 6TB of the 
SATA for VM storage. 

Took us a good month of planning to decide how to segment the network and 
finalize the architecture.   It's been working fine for us, supporting some 8 
physical SQL servers and 5 VM host systems (with ~45 VMs between them)

ASB
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Jafs <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 11:40:40 
To: NT System Admin Issues<[email protected]>
Subject: RE: NAS/SAN

I have an HP EVA 4000 with about 2.5Tb of space with room to grow, it uses 
fiber drives. I'm using VMWare 3.5 in the midst of upgrading to VSphere 4. I 
have had it for about 9 months and I'm very happy.
I'm also in the midst of adding another HP ML 370 G5 server with about 3Tb 
worth of SAS drives for DR across the street in my DR server room. I'm planning 
of using double Take for the synchronization.
I'm also using an older GL 370 G5 server with another 6 * 300Bm SAS drives for 
slower (not super critical data, like pictures etc.)
I think the most important thing about setting up system like this is to have a 
consultant that is very familiar with the equipment!

___________________________________
Stefan Jafs

From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 11:25 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NAS/SAN

That's it!  "SSD" was the acronym.  I kept thinking of superconducting super 
collider...

________________________________
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 10:20 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NAS/SAN

Solid State drive ?

From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 9:04 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NAS/SAN

The Dell Equallogic offerings should serve your needs very well.  They have 
products with "redundant everything", and you can get SATA, SAS, and (I forgot 
the buzz-word for it...) flash-based storage.

________________________________
From: John Aldrich [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 9:06 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: NAS/SAN

So, we're working on getting our first big "storage appliance" here. As the IT 
Manager it's my job to get quotes, etc. I'm talking to all the "big boys" out 
there and getting a lot of good quotes. My requirements are fairly simple:

1)      On the order of 5 Terabytes of storage (significantly more than we are 
using currently.)

2)      Redundant everything (disks, controllers, network, power, etc.)

That's about it. We are looking, eventually, to bring email in-house, probably 
using Kerio mail server as it's got the features we need at a price we can live 
with. The problem is that I'm getting quotes all over the place. The last quote 
I got was for a QNap ISCSI NAS with 6 1 Tb drives, but it doesn't have the 
redundancy I'm looking for (no redundant controllers.)

I've gotten quotes from vendors for HP, LSI, NetApp, QNap and am working on an 
Equallogic quote. Anyone else I should be looking at? Our plan is to get two of 
these for DR/Business Continuity purposes and have one of them at a remote 
office, and possibly even back the remote one up to tape. :)

Am I being too paranoid? Not enough? Anything else I should be looking at? At 
first I was really wanting single-instance storage, but the LSI vendor kind of 
talked me out of that being a requirement. I get a report every night from the 
current storage detailing all duplicate files, and there aren't that many so I 
think I can get away with not having de-duplication/single-instance storage.

Your thoughts, please?
[cid:[email protected]][cid:[email protected]]










This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does not 
represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above, may be 
confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as such in 
accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the intended recipient, 
you are hereby notified that any use of this communication, or any of its 
contents, is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, 
please return to sender and delete the message from your computer system.{token}









This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Amico 
Corpoartion company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure 
no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility 
for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

<<inline: image001.jpg>>

<<inline: image002.jpg>>

Reply via email to