I spent many years (7) working for ISPs, before I became an independent. 
Between our acquisitions and and customer takeovers, I've seen lots of mail 
servers, includin Kerio.

The per-folder design is quite common. There are generally index files for each 
folder too. This is a standard Unix/Linux design philosophy.

Kerio is one of the better mail servers, actually. But that is limited to MAIL.

If you want a do-everything messaging server, similar to Exchange; you need to 
be looking at Merak/Icewarp (on the low-end) to Zimbra or OpenExchange on the 
high-end.

NOTHING replaces appropriate backups and operational procedures.

I actually find Exchange one of the easier messaging system to administer, but 
I know that I'm in the minority in that opinion.
________________________________________
From: Jim Majorowicz [[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 9:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2007, constant hard disk thrashing.

Not to flame too much here, but we just picked up a new client because their
previous IT consultant had them using Kerio v. 6.7.1.  The server that the Kerio
server side software was running on had a hardware crash and needed to be
restored from backup.  For some reason I cannot begin to fathom, the backup data
from the Kerio server contained only *INDIVIDUAL* mail items.  I'm talking .EML
files here.  There was not folder structure, no contacts, nothing but stacks
upon stacks of email files in dated folders.  They lost ALL their contact
information, and if it weren't for one user who also synced his blackberry on
regular basis, they would have been in a world of hurt.

Admittedly I am an Exchange guy, but it seems to me that Kerio has no way to
protect against disaster, other than the occasional deleted email.  I can tell
you I find Kerio lacking in that regard, based on what little contact I've had
with it so far.

We're installing a SBS 2008 server for them as soon as the new hardware
arrives...

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 1:12 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Outlook 2007, constant hard disk thrashing.

We use Kerio, Yes.

The Kerio mail server is very good for our situation. I don't know how many
users we're talking about with the Exchange situation, but we have 200 users
here.

Kerio has exchange compatibility, so users of Outlook/Entourage can connect
using an activesync connection and receive most all the features of Exchange.
Users who want connect that way can, but it's not a supported email client for
us. That being said, I've never had to support any of our Outlook users beyond
setting them up, it just works for them.

We support our users with the webmail interface, which is excellent. Being
webmail, they can/do use separate email folders with filtering/forwarding rules
and whatnot. Other than that, they have a quota they cannot exceed.

Kerio's week spot is it's inability to scale. There are no methods of running
more than a single mail server. So if you're running thousands of users and
feeling sluggish on top-notch hardware, you've moved beyond Kerio's
capabilities.


--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District


----- Original Message -----
From: Angus Scott-Fleming
[mailto:[email protected]]
To: NT System Admin Issues
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wed, 21 Oct 2009
12:42:30 -0700
Subject: Re: Outlook 2007, constant hard disk thrashing.


> On 21 Oct 2009 at 11:29, Matthew W. Ross  wrote:
>
> > What?! 5GB? A separate partition? Can't defrag files that large?!
> >
> > Thank heavens we don't use Outlook/Exchange. That's just insanity, if you
> > ask me.
>
> What do you use?  Your headers say
>
>     X-Mailer: Kerio MailServer 6.7.1 WebMail
>
> Does that mean each end-user manages his/her mailboxes on their local
> machines?
>
> The only reseller in AZ doesn't even list Kerio Mailserver on their website
> FWIW ...
>
>
> --
> Angus Scott-Fleming
> GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
> 1-520-290-5038
> +-----------------------------------+
>
>
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to