Thanks all. I didn't expect that it would be a problem, only asked because someone told me that it wasn't recommended. (and, of course, provided no supporting documentation).
Jeff On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Andrew S. Baker <asbz...@gmail.com> wrote: > None that I can think of. > > > > *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) <http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker> > *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* > * * > Signature powered by > <http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install?utm_source=extension&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=footer> > WiseStamp<http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install?utm_source=extension&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=footer> > > > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Jeff Bunting <bunting.j...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I'm curious, would decreasing the number of processors in a >> multi-processor vm cause a problem with Windows? I'm not talking about multi >> to uni processor changes, only multi to multi, like from 4 to 2 (or 8 to >> 4). I googled around a bit, but haven't found any info; most articles only >> discuss increasing cpus. If Windows is OK with a switch like that, how >> about ESX? >> >> Jeff >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
