On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Sturla Molden <stu...@molden.no> wrote:
> Chad Netzer skrev: > > That's right, Robert. Basically, I meant doing a median on a square > > (or rectangle) "view" of an array, without first having to ravel(), > > thus generally saving a copy. But actually, since my selection based > > median overwrites the source array, it may not save a copy anyway. > > > Avoiding copies of timy buffers is futile optimization. > > QuickSelect is overkill for tiny buffers like common filter kernels. > Insertion sort is fine. > > Shell sort is nice for sizes in the awkward range. Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
