Hi, >> I'm continuing only because, the discussion has generated some heat, >> and I think part of that heat comes from the perception that the >> excellent community spirit of the project is somewhat undermined by >> the feeling that reasonable arguments are not being fully heard. > > How does one get that feeling?
Is that a real question? >> More generally I completely agree that the decisions have to be made >> by the people doing the work, and that I'm not one of them. But, the >> emphasis of the work on numpy has shifted from development to >> maintenance, and I'm still not sure that the discussion thus far has >> fully reflected that fact. > > Unfortunately, it's getting too late to address deficiencies in the > breadth and depth of the already-too-extensive discussion. You should > have spoken up sooner. We need to make a decision now. I'm not asking for influence in the decision, nor am I trying to delay the decision. See you, Matthew _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
