On Thursday, January 27, 2011, Christopher Barker <chris.bar...@noaa.gov> wrote: > On 1/27/11 3:35 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > >>>> What is the thought about having two separate NumPy lists (one for >>>> development discussions and one for user discussions)? > > Speaking as someone who hasn't contributed code to numpy itself, I still > really like to follow the development discussion, so I'll subscribe to > both lists anyway, and filter them to the same place in my email. So it > makes little difference to me. > > -Chris > > -- > Christopher Barker, Ph.D. > Oceanographer > > Emergency Response Division > NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice > 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax > Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception > > chris.bar...@noaa.gov > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
Personally, I like separating the two lists and I think it has served matplotlib well. In gmail, I can tag them separately and with different colors. It makes it very easy to spot which emails I feel like handling at the moment. But, as I have been told, I am weird... Ben Root _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
