On 03.12.2011, at 6:47PM, Olivier Delalleau wrote: > Ah sorry, I hadn't read carefully enough what you were trying to achieve. I > think the double repeat solution looks like your best option then.
Considering that it is a lot shorter than fixing the tile() result, you are probably right (I've only now looked closer at the repeat() solution ;-). I'd still be interested in the performance - since I think none of the reshape or rollaxis operations actually move any data in memory (for numpy > 1.6), it might still be faster. Cheers, Derek _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion