On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Richard Hattersley <rhatters...@gmail.com> wrote: > So, assuming numpy.ndarray became a strict subclass of some new masked > array, it looks plausible that adding just a few checks to numpy.ndarray to > exclude the masked superclass would prevent much downstream code from > accidentally operating on masked arrays.
I think the main point I was trying to make is that it's the existence and content of these checks that matters. They don't necessarily have any relation at all to which thing Python calls a "superclass" or a "subclass". -- Nathaniel _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
