On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:37 AM, <josef.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > I still don't see why order is not a general concept, whether it > refers to memory or indexing/iterating.
I agree -- the ordering concept is the same, it's _what_ is being ordered that's different. So I say we stick with 'C' and 'F' -- numpy users will need to figure out what it means eventually in any case.... we need some better doc strings and *maybe* renaming a keyword arguemnt or two. partly I say maybe because the "order" keyword in ravel() actually mixes the two concepts anyway... -Chris -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception chris.bar...@noaa.gov _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion