On 26 Aug 2014, at 09:05 pm, Adrian Altenhoff <adrian.altenh...@inf.ethz.ch> wrote:
>> But you are right that the problem with using the first_values, which should >> of course be valid, >> somehow stems from the use of usecols, it seems that in that loop >> >> for (i, conv) in user_converters.items(): >> >> i in user_converters and in usecols get out of sync. This certainly looks >> like a bug, the entire way of >> modifying i inside the loop appears a bit dangerous to me. I’ll have look if >> I can make this safer. > Thanks. >> >> As long as your data don’t actually contain any missing values you might >> also simply use np.loadtxt. > Ok, wasn't aware of that function so far. I will try that! > It was first_values that needs to be addressed by the original indices. I have created a short test from your case and submitted a fix at https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/5006 Cheers, Derek _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
