On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Charles R Harris < charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Worth a read at A&D <http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=6867#more-6867>. > Thanks, it is worth a read. Most of the time when I see code copied from scipy or statsmodels, it is properly attributed. But every once in a while (like just now) I see code in an interesting sounding package on github where I start to recognize parts because they have my code comments still left in but don't have an attribution to the origin. It's almost ok if it's MIT or BSD licensed because then I can "borrow back" the changes, but not if the new license is GPL. This is to the point in the discussion of seeing modules or functions that got isolated from the parent package. Josef (slightly grumpy) > > Chuck > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
