On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote:
> On Oct 27, 2015 6:08 AM, <josef.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > [...] > > > > > > What's the equivalent of > > python setup.py build_ext --inplace > > It's > python setup.py build_ext --inplace > > ;-) > Ok, Sorry, I read now the small print and the issue. Sounds reasonable, given we can `force` our way out. (If the reason to run to pip is a misspelled dev version number, then it looks like a hammer to me.) Josef > There's also no replacement for setup.py sdist, or setup.py upload (which > is broken and should never be used), or setup.py clean (which is also > broken and should never be used in numpy's case). pip is a better package > installer than raw distutils or setuptools, for non-installation-related > tasks it has nothing to offer. (With the partial exception of 'pip wheel'.) > > -n > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
