Hi Arnaud,
On 31/07/12 01:02, Arnaud Quette wrote:
Hi Greg,
2012/7/29 Greg Vickers <daehe...@iinet.net.au
<mailto:daehe...@iinet.net.au>>
On 22/07/12 20:14, Greg Vickers wrote:
Hi Arnaud,
On 18/07/12 20:59, Arnaud Quette wrote:
I've just made a quick test on an Opengear ACM 50004-2
(ARM supervision appliance).
For the record:
- uname -a: Linux acm5004-2 2.6.30.2-uc0 #1 Tue Feb 15
09:30:54 EST 2011 armv4tl unknown
- nut version: 2.4.3 (so bcmxcp_usb 0.23)
- tried with a PW5110 (ups.firmware: Cont:00.50 Inve:01.50)
and everything worked like a charm.
That said, Charles and Kjell comments are fully valid.
That is, try with the latest version (2.6.4). It has at
least more debug traces to help getting visibility.
I've tested with nut 2.6.4, with the same result, i.e. this
driver can't communicate with the UPS.
What switches should I use with the driver to provide you the
debug information? More -D switches?
Could you perhaps test the 5110 on your Ubuntu system,
with a recent NUT?
OK, tested on the Ubuntu system and it works just fine! My
PW5110 has the same firmware versions as yours, and the Ubuntu
system I tested on has kernel 3.2.0 on it and nut 2.6.3. I'll
see if I can get kernel 3.2.0 on the RaspberryPi and report back.
I've got kernel 3.2.0 on the RaspberryPi and nut 2.6.4 and the
bcmxcp_usb driver reports the same problem :(
damn, this would lead me to also think about a kernel or libusb issue.
just to be sure, is bcmxcp_usb linked against libusb *0.1* and not
1.0-compat?
$ ldd bcmxcp_usb
/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libcofi_rpi.so (0x401b4000)
libusb-0.1.so.4 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libusb-0.1.so.4
(0x4014f000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libpthread.so.0
(0x40068000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6 (0x401bd000)
/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/ld-linux.so.3 => /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3
(0x40037000)
So yes, looks like it's linked to libusb 0.1.
I'm going to go with the last option I have, and will replace this
UPS with one that works with this combination of architecture and
OS! :)
yup, still an option ;)
Thanks for your help!
Cheers,
Greg
_______________________________________________
Nut-upsuser mailing list
Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
