On Sep 10, 2014, at 9:18 AM, Rob Groner <rgro...@rtd.com> wrote:

>> 
>>> 2) The "Starting the driver" section says to start the driver at
>>> /usr/local/ups/sbin/upsdrvctl , but it's actually located at
>>> /usr/lib/ups/driver/
>> 
>> Right, that was fixed post-2.6 (note that the web pages are all tagged with
>> the version they correspond to; currently 2.7.2)
> 
> I can't see on the webpages where it refers to being about version 2.7.2.  Is 
> this tagging in the html itself?

My fault, the version is only included in the website pages, e.g. 
http://www.networkupstools.org/documentation.html

https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/150

>>> 3) Under Installation Instructions, under "State path creation", it
>>> says to create the directories and make them owned by the user you
>>> created.  It shows "chown root:nut /var/state/ups", but shouldn't it
>>> be "chown ups:nut /var/state/ups"  (I know any user/group can be used,
>>> but ups:nut is what the example had been using so far).
>> 
>> Assuming this is true:
>> 
>>>> Be sure the new user is a member of the new group!  If you forget to
>>>> do this, you will have problems later on when you try to start upsd.
>> 
>> and the mode is 0770, then the NUT user can access those directories, and
>> change the contents, but cannot change the directory itself.
> 
> Ok, that makes sense, but then maybe the wording should be "owned by the 
> group" instead of "user"?  Then there wouldn't be confusion between what it 
> says to do and the command to do it.

Makes sense. Also added to the TODO list: 
https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/151

>>> Just thought I would mention them.  If those paths are distro/package
>>> dependent, then that is ok, but it'd be nice of the docs said that.  I
>>> know elsewhere they do (when talking about installing from source).
>> 
>> Seems like a good idea in principle. How would you reword it?
> 
> Well, since the paths really become important when dealing with the 
> configuration, perhaps at the top of page 6, under the "Note" already there, 
> it could just be said that the paths to the configuration files are 
> distribution dependent, and the ones shown are for <insert distro used here>. 
>  That way, whether someone's coming from the package install or source 
> install, they would both end up at the top of that page and get the note 
> before they start seeing the specific paths.

When you say "Page 6", are you referring to a PDF? Or a sub-section in 
"Configuration"?

-- 
Charles Lepple
clepple@gmail




_______________________________________________
Nut-upsuser mailing list
Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser

Reply via email to