Has anybody noticed that the "RSS" (i.e., OpenSearch) links in the pages
returned directly by Tomcat are wrong if the webapp's URL is like
http://localhost:8080/nutch-0.9/ ? Those links lack the '/nutch-0.9' part.

On the other hand, they are OK if the access passes through an Apache 
connector.

Enzo

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "kevin chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: Tomcat without Apache


>
> Well, according to Tomcat, "With the performance of Tomcat 5 and 6,
> performance reasons become harder to justify." (to integrate Apache with
> Tomcat).
>
> On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 11:33 -0700, Kai_testing Middleton wrote:
>> Tomcat can act as a web server entirely on its own;
>> that's how I serve my small website at home.  It's
>> just not good for high volume service.
>>
>> --- "Kursun, Mahmut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I made a funny experience while trying out nutch.
>> >
>> > I think it was on a machine with Fedora Core 6 or 7.
>> > Tomcat was running, Apache not.
>> >
>> > Tomcat 5.5 responded to http://localhost:8080 with
>> > the start-page.
>> >
>> > Is this really possible or was it any mistake that I
>> > made?
>> > I tought that Apache was needed in order to run
>> > Tomcat.
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________________________________
>> Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect.  Join Yahoo!'s user
>> panel and lay it on us.
>> http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
>>
>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Nutch-general mailing list
Nutch-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nutch-general

Reply via email to