Well done, John...THANK YOU!!
-Eileen Keenan

Shawangunk Grasslands National Wildlife Refuge. 

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: redknot <redk...@optonline.net>
To: Murray, Joseph <r3...@gw.dec.state.ny.us>
Cc: NYSBIRDS-L <NYSBIRDS-L@cornell.edu>
Sent: Thu, Sep 6, 2012 12:11 am
Subject: [nysbirds-l] Application ID: 3-5152-00233/00002 - Article 11, 
Incidental take of Endangered and Threatened Species - Galeville Park & 
Shawangunk NWR


Dear Mr. Murray: I would like to take this opportunity to express my strong 
opposition to the issuance of a permit, pursuant to the above-referenced 
application, by the Department of Environmental Conservation so the Town of 
Shawangunk may move forward to construct a large, regional recreational 
facility at Galeville Park, a town-owned parcel situated adjacent to the 
nationally significant Shawangunk Grasslands National Wildlife Refuge. 


As the application references, the construction of this facility will result in 
the destruction of approximately 10 acres of grassland habitat critical for a 
variety of rare and declining bird species including short-eared owls, northern 
harriers, potentially henslow's sparrows, upland sandpipers, and a host of 
other grassland dependent bird species.  The owl is a state endangered species 
while the other three are state threatened. 


These habitat impacts are proposed to be mitigated by several measures detailed 
in the notice, as laid out below:
 

The Town will convert and maintain approximately 10 acres of the Galeville Park 
property as designated grassland habitat area;
Construction activities for the development of the park will be prohibited 
during nesting and overwintering periods;
Lighting of the four athletic fields will be prohibited;
Dogs will be prohibited; 
The Town has served as the facilitator for the acquisition of an adjacent 31 
acre parcel of land by the USFWS for the creation of an off-site grassland 
habitat area;
The Town will conduct environmental education or interpretive outreach programs 
and will develop enhanced wildlife observation areas;

The Town will construct an interpretative walking trail system at Galeville 
Park with linkage to the adjoining refuge.

I do not believe these mitigation measures sufficiently offset the 
environmental impacts caused by the proposed project - the outright destruction 
of habitat adjacent to one of the most significant grassland areas in the 
northeastern United States. Perhaps this is partially due to the fact that 
given the information presented in the ENB notice it is impossible to judge the 
full extent of the mitigating effect of the proposed measures. For example, one 
of the mitigating measures is the "facilitation by the town of the acquisition 
of an adjacent 31 acre property in which a grassland habitat will be created". 
Without knowing the proximity of this property to the refuge, and the details 
of the proposed grassland creation there is no way to judge its merits and thus 
the extent to which it truly qualifies as a mitigating measure. The same is 
true with the proposed creation of 10 acres of "newly designated grassland 
habitat area" by the town to replace the grassland acreage lost due to the 
construction of the recreational facility.  Ecological restoration dictates 
that in almost all situations a better and more prudent approach is to preserve 
and maintain an existing natural community type rather than to allow for it to 
be destroyed and attempt to re-create it nearby. 


A local article indicates that the proposed football field will be equipped 
with lights. If the other four fields are to remain unlit I strongly urge that 
this field remain unlit as well. 


How will some of the other proposed mitigation measures be enforced?  For 
example, will there be some way to ensure enforcement of the dog ban? 
Generally, mitigation measures which rely on public compliance or cooperation 
typically have less value than measures which don't. 


I don't understand how the last proposed measure - construction of an 
interpretive walking trail with linkage to the refuge - serves to mitigate the 
environmental damage to the grassland habitat.  
 
Furthermore, I was extremely surprised to read that the SEQR determination for 
this action was a Type 1, Negative Declaration. Given its adjacency to the 
refuge, pursuant to Part 617 NYCRR, the Type 1 threshold (the threshold which 
presumes a Positive Declaration) would be lowered to an action affecting a mere 
2.5 acres of land, one fourth the amount of grassland proposed to be destroyed 
by one element of the proposed action and about one twentieth the size of the 
overall action. Given this, and the exceptional value of the habitat for 
demonstrably rare birds, it is inconceivable that the lead agency for this 
action would issue a Negative Declaration. One of the benefits of a Positive 
Declaration, resulting in the preparation of an EIS, would have been a 
requirement to discuss reasonable alternatives to the proposed project, 
including alternative layouts, scope, and most importantly sites.  It is highly 
unfortunate that the full value of SEQR will be unavailable to assess this 
project. 


In conclusion, as an individual who has visited the refuge many times both 
individually and with groups on bird tours through my company, I oppose the 
project as proposed and urge the Department to deny the issuance of the 
requested endangered and threatened species "take" permits.  I urge the 
Department to work with the Town to fully mitigate the impacts of the project 
with the central goal of leaving the grassland portions of the park intact and 
by establishing a sufficient buffer between the active portions of the proposed 
park facility and the refuge.  


Sincerely, 




John Turner
President 
Alula Birding & Natural History Tours   
--
        
NYSbirds-L List Info:
        
Welcome and Basics         
        
Rules and Information         
        
Subscribe, Configuration and Leave
        
Archives:
        
The Mail Archive
        
Surfbirds
        
BirdingOnThe.Net
        
Please submit your observations to eBird!
        
--
 

--

NYSbirds-L List Info:
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsWELCOME
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsRULES
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm

ARCHIVES:
1) http://www.mail-archive.com/nysbirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NYSBirds-L
3) http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/NYSB.html

Please submit your observations to eBird:
http://ebird.org/content/ebird/

--

Reply via email to