Hi Michi, Yes, Tom experienced the same issue yesterday. I'm gonna have a look.
Thanks Dominique On Jul 4, 2012, at 11:23 AM, Michael Dürig wrote: > > Hi, > > I got a ConcurrentModificationException while checking the 0.3 release. > This didn't cause any test case to fail but was printed to the console. > > Michael > > Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.JcrTckTest > java.util.ConcurrentModificationException > at java.util.TreeMap$PrivateEntryIterator.nextEntry(TreeMap.java:1100) > at java.util.TreeMap$EntryIterator.next(TreeMap.java:1136) > at java.util.TreeMap$EntryIterator.next(TreeMap.java:1131) > at > org.apache.jackrabbit.mk.store.DefaultRevisionStore.markBranches(DefaultRevisionStore.java:561) > at > org.apache.jackrabbit.mk.store.DefaultRevisionStore.gc(DefaultRevisionStore.java:497) > at > org.apache.jackrabbit.mk.store.DefaultRevisionStore$2.run(DefaultRevisionStore.java:159) > at > java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:441) > at > java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:317) > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:150) > at > java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:98) > at > java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.runPeriodic(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180) > at > java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:204) > at > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) > at > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680)