On the whole I prefer the laid back approach given in the following link -

www.beastway.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Hall, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:04 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [obc] Lack of TT results- posted on behalf of member Paul
Smeulders




-

----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Smeulders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OBClist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 11:00
Subject: Lack of TT results


> I'm loathe to step into this, but I'd like to point out a few things
> regarding SPECIFICALLY Michael's comments regarding the board, and Avery
in
> particular:
>
> >Avery,
> > [snip]
> >- the board is not a dictatorship in the 2 year
> >interim between elections
>
> I understand that Avery has a vote on a board of how many...12 or 15?
While
> Avery speaks with some influential fervour, he is not at all the board's
> "dictator". They will vote, and Avery's opinion will carry the democratic
> weight it deserves. So happens, I guess, that the majority agree with him,
> from time to time. Evidently so, on this issue. You are free to disagree.
>
> >- your attitudes and opinions surrounding a link to
> >Celia's site are not attitudes and opinions that are
> >the saving grace of the OBC. The OBC existed long
> >before your ideas came along, with supporting websites
> >and information, and the OBC will also continue to
> >exist long after, even if these attitudes and opinions
> >were to be dropped today. So, you needn't think you
> >are doing the membership any favours with your
> >position
>
> Okay, can repeat my above paragraph here again.
>
> >But, more than this, the board has taken on an
> >activity for which they were not asked or required to
> >do by the membership. Where was this attitude in any
> >election platform? The membership didn't have an
> >issue or concern before, and still do not with Celia's
> >sites. The board is responsible for their own
> >difficult existence because of their stance.
>
> >The board is spending time and resources on activities
> >for which there are far better things to do. Just
> >think what great things could be accomplished, if the
> >board spent half as much time and energy as they do
> >tackling this matter, on some more useful persuit.
> >Anyone up for brainstorming of ideas for the board to
> >spend an obvious over-abundance of energy?
>
> The other side of this coin is the following, please consider it, despite
> the argument over the details of the original premise, that of the
> "resignation".
>
> Evidently, the board "believed" they were faced with a resignation. They
> "believed" they HAD to get the work done by someone else. That someone
else
> was not prepared to immediately and magically complete the substitute
> website. I can understand that a board may say: "What is the shortest path
> to a desired result? Negotiating more with someone who has "resigned", or
> just launch the new-guy, and see what he comes up with?". The latter
option
> has a definite desired result at some time, assuming commitment and
> competence. The former may never have a result, and in fact, could further
> delay the result if the latter option ultimately becomes to ONLY option,
ie,
> negotiations fail. We may argue the resignation, as Celia has, and we can
> also argue about taking that second decision...perhaps a little more
> negotiation WOULD have resulted in achieving a satisfactory end-point even
> sooner than we had one. Fact is, now we can't know for sure. We can all
> place our own reasonable guesses.
>
> In the meantime, I greatly benefited from the work of BOTH volunteers, and
I
> thank them.
>
> I'm not saying this as a voice "against Celia" (oh god, never). Let's be
> very very clear that I've come to respect and adore her, and enjoy the
> personality, colour, expertise, and overall contribution she makes to our
> community. I think her contribution would be dearly missed if she really
> stopped working for the TT and the club members. I hope I'm ONLY arguing
> some of Michael's points made with respect to how he believes Avery
dictates
> to the board like some pied-piper, as well as Michael's points regarding
the
> percieved wastage of time. Sometimes you make a decision, you go with it.
> Changing it later, well, that can be an even bigger waste of time. So to
> address Michael's comment :
>
> >"No business would tolerate such behaviour"
>
> ...but they themselves do it often. How's your/my investment portfolio
> doing? <ugh>.
>
> Two sides....its all I'm saying.
>
> It's easy to attack Avery himself, since he has the sometimes dirty job of
> communicating board decisions to the membership. I have no idea whether
the
> whole story is before us or not. I don't think it matters in so far as it
> affects my arguments regarding Michael's comments themselves. It does
matter
> to the larger issue at hand, and I know nothing at all about that.
>
> Peace everybody.
>
> BTW: I think all the websites are in error. Didn't I do a 21:xx at some
> point??
>
> Paul "ohh, THAT was a flash-back, way, way back" Smeulders.
>
> PS: Hey, if people like links, here's one. Yes, it is suitable to download
> at while at work. http://avsquint.bravepages.com/Characters/smeulders2.htm
>
>
>

-------------------------------------------------
For list help, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Club Office:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (613) 230-1064
Website: [EMAIL PROTECTED]    http://www.cyberus.ca/~obcweb
Newsletter:       [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------
For list help, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Club Office:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (613) 230-1064
Website: [EMAIL PROTECTED]    http://www.cyberus.ca/~obcweb
Newsletter:       [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
-------------------------------------------------

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aVxiDo.a2i8p1
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to