Acked-by: Srinivas Eeda <srinivas.e...@oracle.com>

On 06/01/2014 06:53 AM, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> There is a risk that the variable will be used without being initialized.
>
> This was largely found by using a static code analysis program called 
> cppcheck.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqv...@spectrumdigital.se>
> ---
>   fs/ocfs2/dir.c |    2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> index 0717662..27aa4a1 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> @@ -3738,7 +3738,7 @@ static int ocfs2_dx_dir_rebalance(struct ocfs2_super 
> *osb, struct inode *dir,
>       int credits, ret, i, num_used, did_quota = 0;
>       u32 cpos, split_hash, insert_hash = hinfo->major_hash;
>       u64 orig_leaves_start;
> -     int num_dx_leaves;
> +     int num_dx_leaves = 0;
>       struct buffer_head **orig_dx_leaves = NULL;
>       struct buffer_head **new_dx_leaves = NULL;
>       struct ocfs2_alloc_context *data_ac = NULL, *meta_ac = NULL;


_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-devel mailing list
Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel

Reply via email to