On 17/12/13 12:54, Changwei Ge wrote:
> Stack variable fe is no longer used, so trim it to save some CPU cycles
> and stack space.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Changwei Ge <ge.chang...@h3c.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <jiangqi...@gmail.com>

> ---
>   fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
> index 71f22c8fbffd..508422b0032f 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
> @@ -2566,16 +2566,16 @@ static int _ocfs2_free_clusters(handle_t *handle,
>       int status;
>       u16 bg_start_bit;
>       u64 bg_blkno;
> -     struct ocfs2_dinode *fe;
>   
>       /* You can't ever have a contiguous set of clusters
>        * bigger than a block group bitmap so we never have to worry
>        * about looping on them.
>        * This is expensive. We can safely remove once this stuff has
>        * gotten tested really well. */
> -     BUG_ON(start_blk != ocfs2_clusters_to_blocks(bitmap_inode->i_sb, 
> ocfs2_blocks_to_clusters(bitmap_inode->i_sb, start_blk)));
> +     BUG_ON(start_blk != ocfs2_clusters_to_blocks(bitmap_inode->i_sb,
> +                             ocfs2_blocks_to_clusters(bitmap_inode->i_sb,
> +                                                      start_blk)));
>   
> -     fe = (struct ocfs2_dinode *) bitmap_bh->b_data;
>   
>       ocfs2_block_to_cluster_group(bitmap_inode, start_blk, &bg_blkno,
>                                    &bg_start_bit);
> 

_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-devel mailing list
Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel

Reply via email to